Russian hack of dnc server debunked
But the next day VOA noted that Crowdstrike had altered their report, deleting key assertions they had made in the report about Ukrainian army losses, claims that a malware infection contributed to artillery losses and a link to IISS data which they had cited. The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense also claimed that the combat losses and hacking never happened, meaning that Crowdstrike had apparently fabricated facts and details in the report completely.Ĭrowdstrike told VOA that they stood by their findings. Furthermore, the IISS disavowed any connection to the CrowdStrike report. The report was immediately contested by Yaroslav Sherstyuk, maker of the Ukrainian military app in question, who called the company’s report “delusional.” On March 23rd, 2017, Voice of America(VOA) ran a damning piece citing British think tank the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), who stated that CrowdStrike erroneously used IISS data as proof of the intrusion. The report was intended to buttress its claims of Russian hacking in the presidential election. On December 22nd, 2016, Crowdstrike ran another report, alleging that Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app, resulting in heavy losses of howitzers in Ukraine’s civil war with Russian-backed separatists.
![russian hack of dnc server debunked russian hack of dnc server debunked](https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2019/02/2019-01-31T190705Z_1329687178_RC1B1B012440_RTRMADP_3_USA-TRUMP-RUSSIA-STONE-1024x683.jpg)
Crowdstrike Has Misrepresented Data In Order To Push Anti-Russian Narratives They have also shown that many programmers have the ability to create an appearance of ‘false attribution’ which gives the impression that the malware was created by another country, even mimicking the native language of the host country they intend to attribute the attack to.
![russian hack of dnc server debunked russian hack of dnc server debunked](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/180822193630-democratic-national-headquarters.jpg)
Beyond running a report which would satisfy the DNC, the drumming up of fear about Russian cyber menaces meant created a blatant potential conflict of interest for Crowdstrike.Ĭrowdstrike’s analysis also ignored known capabilities, since publicized by Wikileaks in their Day Zero and Marble releases from the Vault 7 series, which have proven the existence of cyber capabilities that allow programmers mask the identity of their malware and masquerade it as belonging to foreign intelligence agencies and mimic their online attack methods. On July 28th, 2016, The Washington Post reported that Crowdstrike was one of a number of cyber security firms making a large profit thanks to widespread fears about Russian hackers.
![russian hack of dnc server debunked russian hack of dnc server debunked](https://api.time.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/hacking-democracy-inside-russia-social-media-war-america.jpg)
Rather than confirm the notion that Russia interfered in American elections, a number of other developments since Crowdstrike’s report have cast increasing doubt on their claims and in fact have suggested that they may be part of a widespread attempt to push disinformation for financial gain and benefit to the groups clients and affiliates.Īlarming indicators that Crowdstrike may have been promoting the idea of “Russian hacking” out of ulterior motives began to emerge almost immediately after their report was released. The report by Crowdstrike stood as one of the first definitive authorities which has found evidence of Russian cyber infiltration or electronic meddling in the 2016 elections. CNN reported that the DNC actually refused to grant the FBI access to their servers despite the agency’s explicitly stating that they could conduct a satisfactory investigation if they were forced to rely on third party data. The DNC’s choice to rely on Crowdstrike exclusively was incredibly controversial.
![russian hack of dnc server debunked russian hack of dnc server debunked](https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/b70/65f/413ee75080f111bbc60d1fba4297497d51-01-trump-putin.rhorizontal.w1200.jpg)
On June 14, 2016, Crowdstrike published a study commissioned by the DNC, in which they accused the Russian government of breaching the DNC’s computer systems. Crowdstrike’s Claims Of Russian Hacking Cannot Be Independently Verified By Government Agencies, Ignore Known Attribution Techniques The founder of Crowdstrike is also tied to the Atlantic Council, a think tank supported by George Soros which has been accused of accepting funds in exchange for support of favored policy positions as well as promoting disinformation and propaganda attacks against anti establishment figures.